Alignd Idea Agent
Analyze ideas. Ask strategic questions. Build the delivery scaffold. All in one agent.
In SAFe enterprise environments, validating a new business idea takes 2-4 weeks and 3-5 meetings before it gets a yes, defer, or reject. The data needed already exists: OKRs, roadmap capacity, open Jira blockers, related epics. Nobody has time to synthesize it. Ideas stall, misaligned epics enter backlogs, and PMs spend hours on artifact work instead of product thinking.
Submit a business idea, get full portfolio analysis and delivery scaffold
Ask strategic questions — what to build, where velocity is lost, what users want
Load your OKRs, PI roadmap, Jira backlog, and GitHub repo. The agent reasons across all of it.
Submit a new idea OR ask a strategic question like "what should we prioritize this PI?"
Review the analysis. Say "Proceed" and the agent scaffolds the full SAFe delivery structure.
Scores each OKR 0-10 with rationale. Color-coded green / amber / red.
Target PI, owning team, and capacity signal from live sprint velocity.
Jira impediments plus PR review notes flagging cross-team dependencies.
Open PRs, stale branches, and review thread blockers from GitHub.
Approve / Defer / Reject with data-backed rationale.
Epic, PI Objective, and Portfolio Sync entry ready for human review.
Both modes support multi-turn conversation. Ask follow-up questions and the agent references actual Epic IDs, OKR names, PR details, and team data in its answers.
Alignd is not a hackathon project. It is a proof of concept built by a practitioner who has lived inside the coordination problems it solves.
Alignd synthesizes what your teams actually put in. Product managers and engineers need to write detailed tickets: clear acceptance criteria, explicit dependencies, realistic story points, and OKR tags. A vague ticket produces a vague analysis. The more context your team puts in, the sharper the intelligence coming out.
Alignd watches ticket age, assignee load, and description quality together. When a ticket has been in progress for two sprints with a one-line description and no acceptance criteria, that is a pattern, not a coincidence. The agent flags it with specific, actionable coaching.
The most important work in PI Planning happens in the week before it starts. If teams walk in without draft objectives that already connect to portfolio OKRs, you lose a big chunk of the two days relitigating strategy instead of resolving dependencies. During the event itself I watch the confidence vote closely. A room full of 6s and 7s is telling you something: either the capacity math is off or there are dependencies nobody wants to say out loud yet. That signal is worth stopping for. Alignd came out of that exact frustration — spending hours pulling together the data needed for that pre-PI conversation from five different places.
The first thing I learned is that by the time something has "gone sideways" you have usually already lost a sprint. So the real answer is: set up the ART Sync cadence so you catch it earlier. I use a simple severity model. If a dependency is threatening a PI Objective I escalate to RTE and ART leadership within 24 hours, but I come with a specific ask, not just a flag. The ask is one of three things: descope the story, pull in capacity from another team, or formally adjust the commitment.
I try to figure out what they are actually resisting first because it is rarely SAFe itself. Usually it is a specific ceremony that feels like overhead. So I start by asking what is painful for them right now: what decisions take too long, what meetings feel pointless, where do they feel like they are working blind. Then I connect SAFe practices to those specific things rather than selling the framework in the abstract.
The thing I watch for is whether the meeting is about decisions or about status. If someone is reading out Jira column states that everyone already has access to, that is a sign the sync has become theater. A good one surfaces two or three things that actually need a call made: an Epic that has drifted from the OKR it was supposed to support, a capacity situation that requires a reallocation. That is the thinking behind how Alignd formats the Portfolio Sync entry it generates — put the decision-relevant information first so the conversation can skip the recap and get to the actual work.
Idea Agent
Describe a business idea. Alignd analyzes it against your org's OKRs, roadmap, and backlog.
Portfolio Advisor
Ask strategic questions about your portfolio. Alignd reasons across your OKRs, roadmap, backlog, and GitHub signals to give you direct, opinionated insight.